MICHIGAN
CODE OF JUDICIAL CONDUCT
Adopted by the Michigan Supreme Court effective October 1, 1974, incorporating
amendments effective through January 18, 1994.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
CANON
1: A
Judge Should Uphold the Integrity and Independence of the Judiciary
CANON
2: A
Judge Should Avoid Impropriety and the Appearance of Impropriety in All Activities
CANON
3:
A Judge Should Perform the Duties of Office Impartially and Diligently
CANON
4:
A Judge May Engage in Activities to Improve the Law, the Legal System, and
the Administration of Justice
CANON
5:
A Judge Should Regulate Extra-Judicial Activities to Minimize the Risk of
Conflict with Judicial Duties
CANON 6: A Judge Should Regularly File Reports of Compensation Received for Quasi-Judicial and Extra-Judicial Activities and of Monetary Contributions
CANON 7: A
Judge or a Candidate for Judicial Office Should Refrain
from Political Activity Inappropriate to Judicial Office
CANON 1: A
Judge Should Uphold the Integrity and Independence of the Judiciary
An independent and honorable
judiciary is indispensable to justice in our society. A judge should participate
in establishing, maintaining, and enforcing, and should personally observe,
high standards of conduct so that the integrity and independence of the judiciary
may be preserved. A judge should always be aware that the judicial system
is for the benefit of the litigant and the public, not the judiciary. The
provisions of this code should be construed and applied to further those objectives.
TOP
CANON 2: A
Judge Should Avoid Impropriety and the Appearance of Impropriety in All
Activities
- Public confidence in
the judiciary is eroded by irresponsible or improper conduct by judges.
A judge must avoid all impropriety and appearance of impropriety. A judge
must expect to be the subject of constant public scrutiny. A judge must
therefore accept restrictions on conduct that might be viewed as burdensome
by the ordinary citizen and should do so freely and willingly.
- A judge should respect
and observe the law. At all times, the conduct and manner of a judge should
promote public confidence in the integrity and impartiality of the judiciary.
Without regard to a person's race, gender, or other protected personal characteristic,
a judge should treat every person fairly, with courtesy and respect.
- A judge should not
allow family, social, or other relationships to influence judicial conduct
or judgment. A judge should not use the prestige of office to advance personal
business interests or those of others. A judge should not appear as a witness
in a court proceeding unless subpoenaed.
- A judge may respond
to requests for personal references.
- A judge should not
allow activity as a member of an organization to cast doubt on the judge's
ability to perform the function of the office in a manner consistent with
the Michigan Code of Judicial Conduct, the laws of this state, and the Michigan
and United States Constitutions. A judge should be particularly cautious
with regard to membership activities that discriminate, or appear to discriminate,
on the basis of race, gender, or other protected personal characteristic.
Nothing in this paragraph should be interpreted to diminish a judge's right
to the free exercise of religion.
TOP
CANON 3: A
Judge Should Perform the Duties of Office Impartially and Diligently
The judicial duties
of a judge take precedence over all other activities. Judicial duties
include all the duties of office prescribed by law. In the performance
of these duties, the following standards apply:
A. Adjudicative
Responsibilities:
- A judge should
be faithful to the law and maintain professional competence in it. A
judge should be unswayed by partisan interests, public clamor, or fear
of criticism.
- A judge may require
lawyers, court personnel, and litigants to be appropriately attired
for court and should enforce reasonable rules of conduct in the courtroom.
- A judge should
be patient, dignified, and courteous to litigants, jurors, witnesses,
lawyers, and others with whom the judge deals in an official capacity,
and should require similar conduct of lawyers, and of staff, court officials, and others subject to the judge's direction and control.
- A judge shall not
initiate, permit, or consider ex parte communications, or consider other communications made to the judge outside the presence of the parties concerning a pending or impending proceeding, except as follows:
- A judge may
allow ex parte communications for scheduling, administrative purposes, or emergencies that do not deal with substantive matters or issues
on the merits, provided:
- the judge
reasonably believes that no party or counsel for a party will
gain a procedural or tactical advantage as a result of the ex
parte communication, and
- the judge
makes provision promptly to notify all other parties and counsel for parties of the substance of the ex parte communication and
allows an opportunity to respond.
- A judge may
obtain the advice of a disinterested expert on the law applicable
to a proceeding before the judge if the judge gives notice to the
parties of the person consulted and the substance of the advice,
and affords the parties reasonable opportunity to respond.
- A judge may
consult with court personnel whose function is to aid the judge
in carrying out the judge's adjudicative responsibilities or with
other judges.
- A judge may, with the consent of the parties, confer separately with the parties and their lawyers in an effort to mediate or settle matters pending before the judge.
- A judge may
initiate or consider any ex parte communications when expressly
authorized by law to do so.
- A judge should
dispose promptly of the business of the court.
- A judge should
abstain from public comment about a pending or impending proceeding
in any court, and should require a similar abstention on the part of
court personnel subject to the judge's direction and control. This subsection
does not prohibit a judge from making public statements in the course
of official duties or from explaining for public information the procedures
of the court or the judge's holdings or actions.
- A judge should
prohibit broadcasting, televising, recording, or taking of photographs
in or out of the courtroom during sessions of court or recesses between
sessions except as authorized by the Supreme Court.
- A judge may properly
intervene in a trial of a case to promote expedition, and prevent unnecessary
waste of time, or to clear up some obscurity, but the judge should bear
in mind that undue interference, impatience, or participation in the
examination of witnesses, or a severe attitude on the judge's part toward
witnesses, especially those who are excited or terrified by the unusual
circumstances of a trial, may tend to prevent the proper presentation
of the cause, or the ascertainment of truth in respect thereto.
Conversation
between the judge and counsel in court is often necessary, but the
judge should be studious to avoid controversies that are apt to obscure
the merits of the dispute between litigants and lead to its unjust
disposition. In addressing counsel, litigants, or witnesses, the judge
should avoid a controversial manner or tone.
A judge should
avoid interruptions of counsel in their arguments except to clarify
their positions, and should not be tempted to the unnecessary display
of learning or a premature judgment.
- A judge should
adopt the usual and accepted methods of doing justice; avoid the imposition
of humiliating acts or discipline, not authorized by law in sentencing
and endeavor to conform to a reasonable standard of punishment and not
seek popularity or publicity either by exceptional severity or undue
leniency.
- Without regard
to a person's race, gender, or other protected personal characteristic,
a judge should treat every person fairly, with courtesy and respect.
To the extent possible, a judge should require staff, court officials,
and others who are subject to the judge's direction and control to provide
such fair, courteous, and respectful treatment to persons who have contact
with the court.
B. Administrative
Responsibilities:
- A judge should
diligently discharge administrative responsibilities, maintain professional
competence in judicial administration, and facilitate the performance
of the administrative responsibilities of other judges and court officials.
- A judge should
direct staff and court officials subject to the judge's control to observe high standards of fidelity, diligence, and courtesy to litigants, jurors, witnesses, lawyers, and others with whom they deal in their official
capacity.
- A judge should
take or initiate appropriate disciplinary measures against a judge or
lawyer for unprofessional conduct of which the judge may become aware.
However, a judge is not obliged to take or initiate disciplinary measures
on the basis of information gained while serving with the substance
abuse counseling program of the State Bar of Michigan, to the extent
the information would be protected under MRPC 1.6 from disclosure if
it were a communication between lawyer and client.
- A judge should
not cause unnecessary expense by making unnecessary appointments. All
appointments shall be based upon merit.
- A judge should
not approve compensation beyond the fair value of services rendered.
C. Disqualification:
Judge should raise the issue of disqualification whenever the judge has
cause to believe that grounds for disqualification may exist under MCR
2.003(B).
D. Remittal
of Disqualification: A disqualification of a judge may be remitted as provided by MCR 2.003(D).
TOP
CANON 4: A
Judge May Engage in Activities to Improve the Law, the Legal System,
and the Administration of Justice
As a judicial officer
and person specially learned in the law, a judge is in a unique position
to contribute to the improvement of the law, the legal system, and the
administration of justice, including revision of substantive and procedural
law and improvement of criminal and juvenile justice. To the extent that
time permits, the judge is encouraged to do so, either independently or
through a bar association, judicial conference, or other organization
dedicated to the improvement of the law.
A judge, subject
to the proper performance of judicial duties, may engage in the following quasi-judicial activities:
- A judge may speak,
write, lecture, teach, and participate in other activities concerning
the law, the legal system, and the administration of justice.
- A judge may appear
at a public hearing before an executive or legislative body or official on matters concerning the law, the legal system, and the administration
of justice, and may otherwise consult with such executive or legislative body or official on such matters.
- A judge may serve
as a member, officer, or director of an organization or governmental
agency devoted to the improvement of the law, the legal system, or the
administration of justice. A judge may assist such an organization in
raising funds and may participate in their management and investment,
but should not individually solicit funds. A judge may make recommendations
to public and private fund-granting agencies on projects and programs
concerning the law, the legal system, and the administration of justice.
TOP
CANON 5: A
Judge Should Regulate Extra-Judicial Activities to Minimize the
Risk of Conflict with Judicial Duties
- Avocational
Activities. A judge may write, lecture, teach, speak, and consult
on nonlegal subjects, appear before public nonlegal bodies, and
engage in the arts, sports, and other social and recreational activities,
if such avocational activities do not detract from the dignity of
the office or interfere with the performance of judicial duties.
- Civic and Charitable
Activities. A judge may participate in civic and charitable activities
that do not reflect adversely upon the judge's impartiality or interfere
with the performance of judicial duties. A judge may serve as an
officer, director, trustee, or nonlegal advisor of a bona fide educational,
religious, charitable, fraternal, or civic organization, subject
to the following limitations:
- A judge
should not serve if it is likely that the organization will
be engaged in proceedings that would ordinarily come before
the judge or will be regularly engaged in adversary proceedings
in any court.
- A judge
should not individually solicit funds for any educational, religious,
charitable, fraternal, or civic organization, or use or permit
the use of the prestige of the office for that purpose, but
may be listed as an officer, director, or trustee of such an
organization. A judge may, however, join a general appeal on
behalf of an educational, religious, charitable, or fraternal
organization, or speak on behalf of such organization.
- Financial Activities:
- A judge
should refrain from financial and business dealings that tend
to reflect adversely on the judge's impartiality or judicial
office, interfere with the proper performance of judicial duties,
exploit the judicial position, or involve the judge in frequent
transactions with lawyers or persons likely to come before the
court on which the judge serves.
- Subject
to the requirements of C(1), a judge may hold and manage investments,
including real estate, and engage in other remunerative activity,
but should not serve as director, officer, manager, advisor,
or employee of any business. Provided, however, with respect
to a judge holding office and serving as an officer, director,
manager, advisor, or employee of any business not prohibited
heretofore by law or judicial canon, the effective date of the
prohibition contained herein shall be the date of expiration
of the judge's current judicial term of office.
- A judge
should manage investments and other financial interests to minimize
the number of cases in which the judge is disqualified. As soon
as it can be done without serious financial detriment, the judge
should dispose of investments and other financial interests
that require frequent disqualification.
- Neither
a judge nor a family member residing in the judge's household
should accept a gift, bequest, favor, or loan from anyone except
as follows:
- A judge
may accept a gift or gifts not to exceed a total value of
$100, incident to a public testimonial; books supplied by
publishers on a complimentary basis for official use; or
an invitation to the judge and spouse to attend a bar-related
function or activity devoted to the improvement of the law,
the legal system, or the administration of justice.
- A
judge or a family member residing in the judge's household
may accept ordinary social hospitality; a gift, bequest,
favor, or loan from a relative; a wedding or engagement
gift; a loan from a lending institution in its regular course
of business on the same terms generally available to persons
who are not judges; or a scholarship or fellowship awarded
on the same terms applied to other applicants.
- A judge
or a family member residing in the judge's household may
accept any other gift, bequest, favor, or loan only if the
donor is not a party or other person whose interests have
come or are likely to come before the judge, and, if its
value exceeds $100, the judge reports it in the same manner
as compensation is reported in Canon 6C.
- For the
purposes of this section, "family member residing in the judge's
household" means any relative of a judge by blood or marriage,
or a person treated by a judge as a family member, who resides
in the judge's household.
- A judge
is not required by this code to disclose income, debts, or investments,
except as provided in this canon and Canons 3 and 6.
- Information
acquired by a judge in a judicial capacity should not be used
or disclosed by the judge in financial dealings or for any other
purpose not related to judicial duties.
- Fiduciary
Activities. A judge should not serve as an executor, administrator,
testamentary trustee, or guardian, except for the estate, testamentary
trust, or person of a member of the judge's immediate family, and
then only if such service will not interfere with the proper performance
of judicial duties. As a family fiduciary, a judge is subject to
the following restrictions:
- A judge
should not serve if it is likely that as such fiduciary the
judge will be engaged in proceedings that would ordinarily come
before the judge or if the estate, trust, or ward becomes involved
in adversary proceedings in the court on which the judge serves
or one under its appellate jurisdiction.
- While acting
as such fiduciary, a judge is subject to the same restrictions
on financial activities that apply in the judge's personal capacity.
- Arbitration.
A judge should not act as an arbitrator or mediator, except in the
performance of judicial duties.
- Practice of
Law: A judge should not practice law for compensation except as
otherwise provided by law.
- Extra-Judicial
Appointments. A judge should not accept appointment to a governmental
committee, commission, or other position that is concerned with
issues of fact or policy on matters other than the improvement of
the law, the legal system, or the administration of justice. A judge,
however, may represent the country, state, or locality on ceremonial
occasions or in connection with historical, educational, and cultural
activities.
TOP
CANON 6:
A Judge Should Regularly File Reports of Compensation Received for
Quasi-Judicial and Extra-Judicial Activities and of Monetary Contributions
A judge may receive
compensation and reimbursement of expenses for the quasi-judicial
and extra-judicial activities permitted by this code, if the source
of such payments does not give the appearance of influencing the judge
in judicial duties or otherwise give the appearance of impropriety,
subject to the following restrictions:
- Compensation:
Compensation should not exceed a reasonable amount nor should it
exceed what a person who is not a judge would receive for the same
activity.
- iExpense Reimbursement.
Expense reimbursement should be limited to the actual cost of travel,
food, and lodging reasonably incurred by the judge and, where appropriate
to the occasion, by the judge's spouse. Any payment in excess of
such an amount is compensation.
- Public Reports.
A judge shall report the date, place, and nature of any activity
for which the judge received compensation, and the name of the payor
and the amount of compensation so received. The judge's report shall
be made at least annually and shall be filed as a public document
in the office of the State Court Administrator or other office designated
by law.
TOP
CANON 7: A
Judge or a Candidate for Judicial Office Should Refrain from Political Activity
Inappropriate to Judicial Office
A. Political Conduct
in General:
- A judge or a candidate
for judicial office should not:
- hold any office
in a political party;
- make speeches on
behalf of a political party or non-judicial candidate or publicly endorse
a candidate for non-judicial office.
- A judge or candidate
for judicial office may:
- attend political
gatherings;
- speak to such gatherings
on the judge's own behalf or on behalf of other judicial candidates;
- contribute to a
political party.
- A judge should resign
the judicial office before becoming a candidate either in a party primary
or in a general election for non-judicial office.
B. Campaign Conduct:
- A candidate, including
an incumbent judge, for a judicial office:
- should maintain
the dignity appropriate to judicial office, and should encourage family
members to adhere to the same standards of political conduct that apply
to the judge;
- should prohibit
public employees subject to the judge's direction or control from doing
for the judge what the judge is prohibited from doing under this canon;
- should not make
pledges or promises of conduct in office other than the faithful and
impartial performance of the duties of the office;
- should not use
or participate in the use of any form of public communication that the
candidate knows or reasonably should know is false, fraudulent, misleading,
deceptive, or which contains a material misrepresentation of fact or
law or omits a fact necessary to make the statement considered as a
whole not materially misleading, or which is likely to create an unjustified
expectation about results the candidate can achieve.
- These provisions govern
a candidate, including an incumbent judge, for a judicial office:
- A judge should
not personally solicit or accept campaign funds, or solicit publicly
stated support by improper use of the judicial office in violation of
B(1)(c).
- A judge may establish
committees of responsible persons to secure and manage the expenditure
of funds for the campaign and to obtain public statements of support
for the candidacy.
- Such committees
are prohibited from soliciting campaign contributions from lawyers in
excess of $100 per lawyer, but may solicit public support from lawyers.
A candidate's committee may solicit funds for the campaign no earlier
than 180 days before a primary election or nominating convention and
may not solicit or accept funds after the date of the general election.
A candidate should not use or permit the use of campaign contributions
for the private benefit of the candidate or the candidate's family.
- If a candidate
is not opposed for such judicial office, the candidate or the candidate's
committee shall return to the contributors funds raised in excess of
the actual costs incurred or contribute such funds to the client security
fund of the State Bar of Michigan, not later than January 1 following
the election.
- Any candidate or
committee having funds remaining after payment of all campaign expenses
shall either return such funds to the contributors thereof or donate
the funds to the client security fund of the State Bar of Michigan,
not later than January 1 following the election.
- No judge should personally
sell or permit any court or public employee working for or assigned to any
court to sell fund-raising tickets or accept contributions of any kind on
the judge's behalf or on behalf of any other judicial candidate.
C. Fund Raising
Other Than for Campaign Purposes Prohibited: Except as provided in 7B(2)(b),
(c),
- No judge shall accept
a testimonial occasion on the judge's behalf where the tickets are priced
to cover more than the reasonable costs thereof, which may include only
a nominal gift,
- No judge or other person,
party, committee, organization, firm, group or entity may accept any contribution
of money or of a tangible thing of value, directly or indirectly, to or
for a judge's benefit for any purpose whatever, including but not limited
to, contribution for a campaign deficit, expenses associated with judicial
office, testimonial, honorarium (other than for services, subject to Canon
6) or otherwise.
All funds at any times
heretofore collected for campaign or any other purposes and not heretofore
expended and not expended for campaign purposes in the year 1974, shall either
be returned to the contributors or donated to the client security fund of
the State Bar of Michigan no later than January 1, 1975.
D. Applicability
- A successful candidate,
whether or not an incumbent, and an unsuccessful candidate who is a judge,
are subject to judicial discipline for campaign misconduct. An unsuccessful
candidate who is a lawyer is subject to lawyer discipline for judicial campaign
misconduct.
- A successful elected
candidate who was not an incumbent has until midnight December 31 following
the election to wind up the candidate's law practice, and has until June
30 following the election to resign from organizations and activities, and
divest interests that do not qualify under Canons 4 or 5.
- Upon notice of appointment
to judicial office, a candidate shall wind up the candidate's law practice
prior to taking office, and has six months from the date of taking office
to resign from organizations and activities and divest interests that do
not qualify under Canons 4 or 5.
TOP